Collinearity and multivariable analysis: response to comments by Claret et al.

Authors’ response to comments from Nachman KE et al.

Authors' response to comments letter to the editor from Nachman KE et al.

Response to Comments on Brandão et al. (2005)

Comments and Replies Response to the ‘ ‘ Comment ’ ’ by S . Hallbeck et al

The first half of the Comment by Hallbeck et al. about our recent paper [1] describes an all BC device, described in Ref. [2], that is unlike the BC–silicon detector we mentioned in our paper. Although their observations about their all BC device are interesting, they are nevertheless inconsequential to our assertions about a BC–Si detector [1]. The use of solid boron compounds for thermal neut...

In Response to a Meta-Analysis by Strong et al.

Within the scientific community, it is common for researchers to disagree on the theoretical assumptions that are at the foundation of controlled investigations, to disagree on optimal study methodology, and to disagree on the interpretation of outcomes. Scientific debate of this kind is healthy and, when it is unbiased and factually based, it can propel science forward. However, some debate is...

Response to Dr. Moya’s Comments to Article by Thoene M et al., Nutrients 2016, 8, 451

This reply is a supplementary addition to our previous article entitled "Comparison of a Powdered, Acidified Liquid, and Non-Acidified Liquid Human Milk Fortifier on Clinical Outcomes in Premature Infants" as published in Nutrients in July 2016. It provides a response to a comment made by Dr. Fernando Moya to this original article, so the purpose of this is to compare and contrast various persp...